Fringe, “Worlds Apart”: renewed urgency

Quick Take: Fringe, “Worlds Apart”
“Keep looking up after it rains.” – Olivia

 Fringe, Worlds Apart

Review: Fringe, “Worlds Apart”
(S0420) Don’t unplug your “Fringe Friday” sign just yet, universe-hoppers; despite a waning audience, and by extension, gradually declining profit margins, Fox has perhaps learned from its frying of Firefly and signed on to give Fringe fans the closure they deserve. Announced earlier today, J.J. Abrams’ sci-fi-bending drama has been slated for a streamlined 13-episode season to play out the endgame so recently put into motion.

Which brings us to “Worlds Apart.” Separate though the universes may be, Walter has had a dream – one in which David Robert Jones plans to annihilate existence in a dimensional-shredding singularity. The sense of excitement and urgency is certainly invigorated by the knowledge that, even if DRJ can be stopped, the Observers will still take over the world(s), having poisoned their own beyond repair, as revealed in last week’s flash-forward.

We’ve already seen the veritable Noah’s Ark of Fringe beasts that Jones plan to terrorize and populate the world with, and it’s common consensus that his plans don’t stop there. During a meeting between the most important figures in Fringe – some of which happen to be doppelgangers – they learn that Jones is progressing with his plans to synchronize the frequency of both worlds, effectively knocking out the pieces of the multiverse like a game of Don’t Break the Ice.

 Having already proven his capabilities with the impossible element, Amphilicite, Jones has once again extended his influence over former Cortexiphan patients. Continuing down a running string of similarities from earlier seasons, we are finally reintroduced to the pyrokinetic Sally Clark and extremely empathic Nick Lane – or rather, Lanes – one of whom is misled in his attacks against existence.

The shuffled deck of abilities available to Cortexiphan patients has always been hinted at, but aside from Olivia, everyone dies before they can develop more than one power. Now, it seems, Jones has amassed an army in both worlds, causing Cortexiphan-induced earthquakes across Earth 1 and Earth 2 under the guise of protecting the multiverse against Walter Bishop and William Bell.

Unable to neutralize the onslaught of psychic attacks, the multiverse must confront a desperate reality: the bridge between worlds must be closed. Despite the aid being provided to the other side, it would ultimately amount to nothing should Jones succeed in killing both worlds. Even though there’s another season left to decide the fate of the worlds, it will be a true emotional feat to top the touching parting of ways between friends and counterparts alike as the First People’s machine raises the bridge between universes.

By Mark D Curran

About the author

Mark is a freelance writer, student of English and Philosophy, and still has too much time on his hands. If you have any of your own, check out the blog and follow him on Twitter!

http://twitter.com/#!/MarkDCurran

More From Mark D Curran

"It's stuck on 2003." - Michael Bluth
Read More
If the impact of last night’s finale of the Walking Dead was at all diminished by the quality of season premieres it went up against, I’d hate to see how it would have matched up against those same shows’ finales.
Read More
“It is not about fate, Walter. It is about changing fate.” - Donald
Read More
5 Comments
On: Friday, April 27, 2012
Tomalak Geret'kal said:

Help shows like Fringe by avoiding absolutes like "waning audience". It's far from proven that Nielsen ratings are truly representative of a show's audience, which is a huge problem for the more expensive shows that require high advertising income to fund. Let's instead instill some doubt as to the veracity of Nielsen as a means for marketers to gauge the value of the various advertising slots.

On: Friday, April 27, 2012
Tomalak Geret'kal said:

And, incidentally, the implication is that last week's episode was a one-off set in an apocryphal spin-off reality (hence the title "Letters of Transit"). I'm resisting the notion that the show's "real" timeline(s) lead to Observer invasion. Indeed, the Observer invasion story was logically at odds with key parts of the known Fringe mythology, lending further credence to the notion that it should be taken so literally.

On: Friday, April 27, 2012
Tomalak Geret'kal said:

should not*

On: Saturday, April 28, 2012
Venningp said:

@Tomalak Geret'kal Why is the Observer invasion story logically at odds with key parts of the known Fringe mythology?

On: Saturday, April 28, 2012
Mark D Curran said:

Tom, I didn't mean to imply anything by using the term "waning audiences," though it doesn't help to ignore the reality that Fringe doesn't have the same following it used to. Was I supposed to say "Despite an audience which may or may not be growing"? Denying the facts of a situation doesn't make them go away. Fringe's fate may not be set in stone, but it's set in ink, and one reviewer isn't going to make or break the future of a TV show by qualifying its audience as big, small, growing, or waning. Though I'm flattered that you think I can.

As for the Observers - nothing about last week's episode "implied" to be one-off, aside from how it was conceptualized. Nothing much about Fringe is ever "one-off" if you've been watching, and nothing about last week conflicts with the Fringe mythology as far as I can tell (and I've watched it three times now). If you're going to suggest that entire episodes have absolutely no bearing on the overarching storyline, show me some evidence.

Name:

Email (Will not be used):

Comment:

characters left

Featured Shows

 
 

Featured Articles

Popular Today

 

Recent Comments

The IT Crowd: Highly underrated comedy returns for one last episode
Its ironic that just a few days ago that I read an interview with Chris O'Dowd (as I'm very much digging HBO's Family Tree) wherein...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
I do the same tara, and part of it for me has something to do with the compulsion for serialized storytelling. But I do also distinguish...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
My TV viewing is filled with misery TV too - and goes back years to the start of the anti-hero trend. I think the conflict feeds...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
Lately I have realized how much depressing TV I watch; Vampire Diaries, Sons of Anarchy, Game of Thrones and I don't know why that...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
And made me think about too for as bubble gum pop as Buffy the Vampire Slayer could be at times, it trended consistently darker,...
Family Tools, "Now You See Me, Now You Don't": the art of disappearing
Guess the author of this article didn't hear that Family Tools has already been cancelled and tonight's episode has been pulled...
Parks and Recreation: why is everyone so mean to Jerry?
I can respect the opinion that you don't like the running gag in regards to Jerry, but at least recognize that he is hardly the...
Parks and Recreation: why is everyone so mean to Jerry?
I think everyone's attitude toward Jerry makes sense within the deliciously oddball universe that is Parks and Recreation. It's...
Supernatural, "The Girl with the Dungeons and Dragons Tattoo": Revenge of the nerds
felicia day is one of the most overrated people in tv/film... if she didnt pretend to be a geeky girl, no one would even give 2...