Hell's Kitchen (U.S.) Season 7, "16 Chefs Compete": Hell-o

Quick Take: Hell's Kitchen, "Episode One" 
Meet the victims -- I mean, contestants...

Review: Hell's Kitchen, "Episode One"
The seventh season of Hell's Kitchen (U.S.) has just begun on FOX and for the contestants it looks to be a long, hot summer in the kitchen with chef Gordon Ramsay once again.  The prize this time out is the position of Executive Chef at the reopening of Ramsay's Savoy Grill in London, England.

What I find most interesting about Hell's Kitchesan is that the producers seem more interested in making a compelling television show with "characters" rather than looking for the most talented chefs, like Bravo's Top Chef.  For example, the resumes of the contestants aren't impressive from a culinary standpoint.  Andrew is a farmer from New York, and Ed teaches cooking at a New Jersey high school.  Also, some seem more interested in being on TV.  Holli, a cute young woman from California, shows up in high heels, and Mikey from Hawaii has gotten the series logo tattooed on his torso.

The episode begins with 17 contestants being introduced to the media.  Then, as with every season, the chefs are divided into teams by their gender and sent into the kitchen to each make their signature dish.  First up, a stay-at-home mother/cookbook author who never worked in a restaurant.  Though he expected something terrible, Ramsay enjoys the dish.  The woman is still uncomfortable, so he tries to put her at ease.  All of a sudden, he starts hitting on her, which seems extremely odd with the recent accusations of adultery, so it's obviously a put-on.  The other contestants are startled watching them kiss and Ramsay reveals it to be his wife Tana.  This is a lesson about talent being more important than experience.

With the teams an even eight on each side, Ramsay has them compete against each other in pairs.  There were a few unintended memorable dishes.  Pizzeria chef Salvatore is an immigrant from Naples, Italy, who has been in the states for 21 years.  He serves up undercooked spaghetti.  Sous chef Jamie from Chicago serves up a dangerous plate with a toothpick in it.  Line cook Nilka from New York made hot wings from half bottle of Tabasco, which was too much for Ramsay as it would be most people.

The men are deemed the winners, and both teams retire for the night to study the menu.  As they relax, the reality television portion of the show kick into gear and an alarm goes off, summoning them to watch a video lesson of Ramsay preparing items on the restaurant's menu.  This goes on about every twenty minutes until two a.m. when everyone finally gets to go to sleep.  However, it's an early rise for the women at 6:17 who must serve the guys breakfast as a result of losing the competition. 

Ramsay has been fixated throughout the episode about completing their first service and the real test begins when the restaurant opens.  Stacey brags about her food and cooking for celebrities in interviews, but is the first to stumble trying to prepare the scallops appetizer, failing to season and cook them properly.  Salvatore burns an appetizer twice.  Fran, who reveals she's scared of Ramsay, is caught putting crab into the lobster risotto.  While the diners are likely disappointed to not be getting food, they are likely glad they didn't get Benjamin's risotto as he tasted it and then stirred it with the same spoon. 

With nothing going out, Ramsay grows very frustrated. When Jamie fails to get an order right, Maria laughs nervously at her misfortune.  This enrages Ramsay, and he orders them both out of the kitchen along with Fran.  The men suffer a similar fate.  With Salvatore and Benjamin making no progress, they get kicked out.  After giving different times, Stacey reveals she doesn't know the amount of time to cook an appetizer and is sent away, as is Mikey for twice sending raw halibut entrees to the pass.  To be fair, the first one is sent because fellow contestant Scott tells him, and Mikey doesn’t stand his ground.  The remaining chefs are brought together and complete the service.

Ramsay declares the women's team the loser and tells them to pick two nominees for expulsion.  Stacey and Fran both deserved to be nominated since they got the boot upstairs for their food.  Stacey accepts it, but Fran is upset and calls out teammate Autumn for doing nothing and not helping.  She fails to recognize that Autumn was on the garnish station, so if no one gets her food, there is nothing for her to do.  In front of their judge, Fran offers excuses and Stacey admits she failed.  Both had terrible services, but possibly due to the producers sensing potential conflict in the future, Ramsay sends Stacey home.

One down, fifteen to go.

By Gordon S. Miller

About the author

Gordon S. Miller is the artist formerly known as El Bicho, the nom de plume he used when he first began reviewing movies online for The Masked Movie Snobs in 2003.  Before the year was out, he became that site's publisher.  Over the years, he has also contributed to a number of other sites as a writer and editor, such as Blogcritics, FilmRadar, and High Def Digest.  He became the Editor-in-Chief of Cinema Sentries upon its inception in 2011.

More From Gordon S. Miller

The quality of this '80s syndicated series led to a worldwide multimedia franchise.
Read More
Day One round-up of PBS at the TCA Winter 2012 Press Tour.
Read More
The cast and crew stave off a sophomore slump.
Read More
7 Comments
On: Thursday, June 3, 2010
Eric - TV Geek Army "Revered Leader" said:
First, *great* piece and welcome to TVGA El Bicho ! I've actually considered from time to time whether Hell's Kitchen brings in "ringers" who are meant to simply be "characters" among the cast (the guy who almost got into a fist fight with Ramsay last season comes to mind). What's obvious though is that some obvious "dead weight" contestants are brought on with no chance of winning. I actually enjoy the show more as time goes on and the chefs with some modicum of talent and professionalism are left competing for the top prize. I think the "guarantee" of finishing the first service came out of the desire to spice up the early season going. Why not guarantee that every week, though? Still, you'd have to say that seven seasons in that this is a show with a fairly durable formula... though Ramsay's early going at IT'S RAW, kicking people out of the kitchen, general ranting/yelling/raving, and kicking the garbage can are all somewhat old hat by now.
On: Thursday, June 3, 2010
Gordon S. Miller said:
That guy was ridiculous. Also, when they puff up titles for people serving food at an old folks home and the mall, it's obvious something's fishy. It does seem unfair to get people's hopes up, but they are all adults who should know what they are in for. I never feel bad for anyone who signs up after first season of a show airs. Ramsay certainly isn't shocking anymore. Just the contestants, like on Kitchen Nightmares
On: Thursday, June 3, 2010
Eric - TV Geek Army "Revered Leader" said:
Absolutely on both counts! Unlike Top Chef where an early exit could legitimately be damaging to one's reputation (though I'd say that's probably the rare case with the quality level they bring in these days) there's much more of a yearning for .15 minutes of fame going on here for a lot of these guys. Like, if you haven't been a line cook in many years, why would go on national television in a competition where you do a lot of just that?
On: Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Justice Angelicus said:

I found myself wondering how many "fake" contestants there are on the show.  Ones that manage to survive week after week without showing any appreciable skill or talent, and inevitably are cast off, their only contribution being to the drama of the show.

 

I suppose that it's a fine line between choosing contestants that you know will never make it (like the guy this season brought in only to highlight his creepy Dahmer vibe before leaving  in a personality disordered huff) and hiring people with specific direction from the producers to cause a certain type of trouble.  But considering that the show is a hodgepodge of producer tinkering, misleading edits and other reality show grab bag tricks, both hypotheses are equally reasonable.

On: Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Eric - TV Geek Army "Revered Leader" said:
Yeah, I agree, and some reality shows produce a more realistic aesthetic (for lack of better term) than others. For example, as contrived as Survivor is (and how manipulative the editing) in some ways, it's impossible to have a ringer in the mix.
On: Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Gordon S. Miller said:
Justice it is an odd show the way it's put together because I honestly can't see anyone but Benjamin running a restaurant. It's too bad they don't get better cooks but looking at past winners most don't stay with Ramsay for long if at all so it's just entertainment in the long run.
On: Monday, July 5, 2010
Eric - TV Geek Army "Revered Leader" said:
I agree but would say the quality of the chefs have been getting better, particularly in the "core group" after the obvious dead wood has been cut.
Name:

Email (Will not be used):

Comment:

characters left

Featured Shows

 
 

Featured Articles

Popular Today

 

Recent Comments

The IT Crowd: Highly underrated comedy returns for one last episode
Its ironic that just a few days ago that I read an interview with Chris O'Dowd (as I'm very much digging HBO's Family Tree) wherein...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
I do the same tara, and part of it for me has something to do with the compulsion for serialized storytelling. But I do also distinguish...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
My TV viewing is filled with misery TV too - and goes back years to the start of the anti-hero trend. I think the conflict feeds...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
Lately I have realized how much depressing TV I watch; Vampire Diaries, Sons of Anarchy, Game of Thrones and I don't know why that...
Game of Thrones shocker: why do we love Misery TV?
And made me think about too for as bubble gum pop as Buffy the Vampire Slayer could be at times, it trended consistently darker,...
Family Tools, "Now You See Me, Now You Don't": the art of disappearing
Guess the author of this article didn't hear that Family Tools has already been cancelled and tonight's episode has been pulled...
Parks and Recreation: why is everyone so mean to Jerry?
I can respect the opinion that you don't like the running gag in regards to Jerry, but at least recognize that he is hardly the...
Parks and Recreation: why is everyone so mean to Jerry?
I think everyone's attitude toward Jerry makes sense within the deliciously oddball universe that is Parks and Recreation. It's...
Supernatural, "The Girl with the Dungeons and Dragons Tattoo": Revenge of the nerds
felicia day is one of the most overrated people in tv/film... if she didnt pretend to be a geeky girl, no one would even give 2...